Please note that there is currently a content freeze on these pages due to the ongoing migration to the new Content Management System, Terminal 4. The information is correct as of 21 March 2017, but please contact the Academic Model team below in the first instance.
The module development procedure ensures that all proposals to develop new modules of study or to change previously approved modules are scrutinised thoroughly on academic grounds. This scrutiny ensures that each module of study offered by Queen Mary is designed to the highest possible academic standards and offers students the best possible teaching and learning experience. It also ensures that resource implications are identified and resolved at the earliest stage.
Detailed guidance relating to the procedures for the approval, amendment/update and withdrawal of modules, including flowcharts, is given in the Programme and Module Developer's Guidelines below.
Information and guidance regarding the design and revision of programmes is included in the section on Programme Development.
All programme / module developments will be considered and/or reported at Taught Programmes Board.
School/Institute Learning and Teaching Committees are responsible for approving/not approving most kinds of new modules (with some exceptions) and changes to existing modules, subject to the deadlines set by ARCS. Further details about the procedure are given in the guidelines.
Information concerning the content, level, assessment methods and availability of a module to students can be found via the QM Module Directory. Guidance for Academic and Administrative Staff regarding the source of this information, and how to update it, can be found in the document QMUL Module Directory - Guidance for Academic and Administrative Staff.
- Programme and Module Developer's Guidelines
- Academic Regulations
- Summary of the Module Approval Process
- Summary of the Module Amendment
- Guidance Notes for Summer School Module Proposals
- Queen Mary Academic Credit Framework
- Generic Level Descriptors
- Module Directory - Guidance for Staff
External sources to be used in module development include:
- QAA Framework for Higher Education Qualifications
- QAA Subject Benchmark Statements
- HESA JACS Codes (Version 3)
- SEEC Credit Level Descriptors 2010
The JACS code of a programme (and module) should reflect the subject content of the programme (or module). However, a JACS mapping [Updated August 2013] showing where a student will appear in the University Guides, as well as UNISTATS and NSS, based on proportion of programme apportioned to a programme JACS, is provided for information.
Please Note: Interactive Forms cannot be previewed in browser. If you have difficulty when clicking on the form link, please disable the Adobe Reader in-browser plugin and try again. Details of how to disable the plugin can be found here.
- Module Proposal Form (UG)
- Summer School Module Proposal Form
- QMUL Model Only Level 4 Module Proposal Form (UG)
- Module Proposal Form (PG)
- Half Module Proposal Form (UG)
- Half Module Proposal Form (PG)
- Module Amendment Form (UG)
- QMUL Model Only Level 4 Module Amendment Form (UG)
- Module Amendment Form (PG)
- Module Withdrawal Form
In order to make use and complete the interactive forms colleagues will require Adobe Reader 9 or later. The latest version of Adobe Reader can be downloaded from this link and is free to download-http://get.adobe.com/uk/reader/?promoid=DAFYK.
Once the relevant form has been download it should then be saved and completed. Failure to save the document will mean that data will be lost if you press the back button in your internet browser. The following naming conventions should be used for saving module forms:
- MPF_<<module title>> for Module Proposal Forms
- MAF_<<module title>> for Module Amendment Forms
- MWF_<<module title>> for Module Withdrawal Forms